The end of an unjust law
During recent weeks, the Supreme Court of Mexico was consitucionalidad discussing the "Televisa Law."
For once it seems that justice has worked in my country.
Friday, June 8, 2007
Tuesday, May 22, 2007
Best Program For Ubuntu
Nestlé's deceptions on Wikipedia
One of the things that eases me being diabetic is to follow a more or less strict diet.
champion in this deception is Nestlé products "Light." They labeled "Sugar Free" and yet the ingredients, without exception, is dextrose, almost always in first or second, depending on the bought.
appears that the chemicals do not know what is dextrose or sucrose for them is just sugar and nothing else, a return to the Wikipedia do not fall too bad as it seems that the school not taught them:
Wikiquote:
"In contrast, in industrial areas is the word sugar or sugar to designate different monosaccharides and disaccharides , which generally taste sweet, but by extension refers to all carbohydrates . "
From Nestle moves in the inadimisible industrial area is seeking to mislead consumers by saying "No Sugar" colloquially.
Another unpleasant surprise I ever did was to change his concept of "Light" several times, for a few weeks their ice cream was light without sucrose or glucose , a marvel because it kept my normal glycemic indexes still eating dessert, but one day decided that "Light" was "fat but sugar." When I reached high glucose levels checked the label had changed. Weeks after "Light" was a mixture of glucose and phenylalanine (glucose as the second ingredient) and fat free. Being
diabetics between 10% and 15% of the population believe that we should be a serious market for suppliers of Nestlé size (not counting all those who try to follow a diet low in carbohydrates).
Moral: Even the label tells the truth. How odd is not it?
One of the things that eases me being diabetic is to follow a more or less strict diet.
champion in this deception is Nestlé products "Light." They labeled "Sugar Free" and yet the ingredients, without exception, is dextrose, almost always in first or second, depending on the bought.
appears that the chemicals do not know what is dextrose or sucrose for them is just sugar and nothing else, a return to the Wikipedia do not fall too bad as it seems that the school not taught them:
Wikiquote:
"In contrast, in industrial areas is the word sugar or sugar to designate different monosaccharides and disaccharides , which generally taste sweet, but by extension refers to all carbohydrates . "
From Nestle moves in the inadimisible industrial area is seeking to mislead consumers by saying "No Sugar" colloquially.
Another unpleasant surprise I ever did was to change his concept of "Light" several times, for a few weeks their ice cream was light without sucrose or glucose , a marvel because it kept my normal glycemic indexes still eating dessert, but one day decided that "Light" was "fat but sugar." When I reached high glucose levels checked the label had changed. Weeks after "Light" was a mixture of glucose and phenylalanine (glucose as the second ingredient) and fat free. Being
diabetics between 10% and 15% of the population believe that we should be a serious market for suppliers of Nestlé size (not counting all those who try to follow a diet low in carbohydrates).
Moral: Even the label tells the truth. How odd is not it?
Sunday, March 18, 2007
Wilderness By Fleetwood Owners Manual
Grunt
I am sorry that the English Wikipedia entries sometimes things like the puffs of Alejandro Jodorowsky on psychomagic .
That also has all the flavor of advertising campaign. But hey, you have to respect democracy, even when this is shown woefully inefficient.
more arguments later.
I am sorry that the English Wikipedia entries sometimes things like the puffs of Alejandro Jodorowsky on psychomagic .
That also has all the flavor of advertising campaign. But hey, you have to respect democracy, even when this is shown woefully inefficient.
more arguments later.
Subscribe to:
Posts (Atom)